should tony blair step down?

for some reason i feel compelled to comment on this. ūüėČ

the recent charges against members of blair’s labour government in the cash-for-honours scandal are troubling. it’s hard to imagine how so many people involved with this current scandal¬†could be arrested without cause to do so, which is why it’s surprising that no charges have been brought against those accused of breaking the 1925 Honours Act. when there is an accusation that contributions to a political party directly¬†bought titles or influenced a policy decision, those accusations should be seriously dealt with.¬†no votes should be bought.¬†¬†the¬†amount given¬†to a political party¬†should not determine who holds positions of power in the party.¬† in a perfect world, this would be the case, but we don’t live¬†in a perfect world. those with¬†the money have more control over political parties than¬†those who don’t.¬†¬†that’s just the way it is.¬†

as for the unfortunate prime minister, it seems to me that the british people have found him guilty until proven innocent.¬† tony blair has been prime minister in the UK for 10 years. that’s a long time. they want and need an excuse to get rid of him. he has been questioned about this scandal several times now and each time it was as a witness, not as a suspect in the case. he has not been charged with anything, and of course, denies doing anything wrong. i¬†believe him. i’m probably the only one who does. if he is innocent, as i suspect, then he should welcome the investigation.

the bigger question to me is: who will replace tony blair when he chooses to step down? will it be blair-lite david cameron, fan of the nanny state?¬† will it finally be gordon brown’s turn to live in number 10? will it be some unknown stealing the spotlight from both of these men? the only prediction i feel confident in making¬†is that the next PM probably won’t be a LibDem.