Comments on: smackdown: the carter vs. bush edition

By: Lisa

Lisa — Wed, 23 May 2007 00:50:07 +0000

You can call Iraq a disaster and still not believe that Bush 43 is the worst president in American history. While I’ve been disappointed with some of his decisions and frustrated by his unwillingness/inability to defend them to the country, I still believe that Dubya has done some good things during his time in office. The comparison between Dubya’s record and Carter’s isn’t in Carter’s favor (at least in my opinion), so I’m surprised that he really wants to make this argument.

By: Vigilante

Vigilante — Tue, 22 May 2007 03:42:26 +0000

Too bad Carter felt intimidated into backing off his statement because it’s absolutely true. Bush is the worse president in American history. I would go further and say I hope he is the worse possible president, because I would hate to think that someone could be elected who would be even worse. But Carter backed off. He is, after all, 80 or more. Right? A little frail, perhaps. But his judgment is still more sound than most Republicans half his age.

By: Lisa

Lisa — Mon, 21 May 2007 21:32:20 +0000

You would think that the liberals would bash Carter for backing off these remarks, but they don’t.

By: Jenn

Jenn — Mon, 21 May 2007 17:32:27 +0000

I like how, just like J. Kerry’s “stuk n’ Irak comment, he’s backing off like the good little libtard he is. Typical.